Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 July 20253361311

Ground Floor Flat, 60 Leyton Park Road, Leyton, London, E10 5RL

Planning appeal 3361311 at Ground Floor Flat, 60 Leyton Park Road, Leyton, London, E10 5RL (Waltham Forest London Borough Council) was dismissed on 24 July 2025 by Inspector Simms S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area.

the erection of a single storey rear extension, depth no greater than 6m, height no greater than 4m, eaves height no greater than 3m

Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Simms S
Postcode
E10 5RL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the development would provide adequate living conditions for its occupiers with particular regard to storage, outlook and natural light
  • whether the development would provide adequate living conditions for the occupiers of 58 Leyton Park Road with regard to outlook and enclosure

What decided it

The cumulative harm to character and appearance through reduction of rear garden areas and the inadequate outlook and natural light for potential future bedroom occupiers outweighed any other considerations.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 53 of the Waltham Forest Local Plan LP1 (2024)Policy 56 of the Waltham Forest Local Plan LP1 (2024)Policy 57 of the Waltham Forest Local Plan LP1 (2024)Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

477 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Waltham Forest London Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed22 October 20266011485
    Land Adjoining 120 Warner Road, Walthamstow, London, E17 7DZ
  2. Allowed20 October 20266013085
    53 Badlis Road, London, E17 5LG
  3. Dismissed29 September 20266012954
    Unit 1, 6 - 10, Central Parade, 137 Hoe Street, Walthamstow, London, E17 4RT
  4. Dismissed29 September 20266012953
    Unit 1, 6 - 10, Central Parade, 137 Hoe Street, Walthamstow, London, E17 4RT
  5. Dismissed28 September 20266011926
    220 Hoe Street, Walthamstow, London, E17 3AY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.