Planning appeal decision
6 Stroud Gardens, Christchurch, BH23 3QY
Planning appeal 3361396 at 6 Stroud Gardens, Christchurch, BH23 3QY (Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole) was dismissed on 17 November 2025 by Inspector Kay D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the local area.
Outbuilding for use in part associated with short term holiday lets and partly for family use as spare bedroom accommodation
- Authority
- Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Kay D
- Postcode
- BH23 3QY
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the local area
- the effect of the development on the living conditions of existing and future occupiers
- whether the development demonstrates compliance with vehicular and cycle parking standards
- the effect of the development on international and nationally designated sites of importance for biodiversity
What decided it
The development failed to demonstrate nutrient neutrality for the River Avon SAC and failed to provide biodiversity net gain or secure mitigation for the Dorset Heathlands designated sites, contrary to the statutory framework and local plan policies, and the biodiversity harm could not be overcome by the housing land supply shortfall due to the habitat site protections in the Framework.
Although the Council cannot demonstrate a five-year housing land supply, the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply where the proposal is likely to have a significant effect on a habitats site without an appropriate assessment concluding no adverse effect on integrity; the biodiversity harm and living conditions harm outweighed any housing supply benefit.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy HE2Policy KS12Policy ME1Policy ME2Policy CS30
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 56Paragraph 11Paragraph 193Paragraph 195Paragraph 187
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Bournemouth Christchurch and Poole
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed29 September 2026600783665a Richmond Wood Road, Bournemouth, BH8 9DQ
- Allowed28 September 20266007175281-291 and The Old Joinery, Bournemouth Road, Poole, BH14 9AH
- Allowed24 September 202660071875 Higher Blandford Road, Poole, BH18 9AB
- Allowed4 September 2026601111118 Sandbourne Road, Bournemouth, BH4 8JH
- Allowed4 September 20266003539Marina Court, 34 Banks Road, Poole, BH13 7QE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®