Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 October 20253361565

7 Watery Lane, LONDON, SW20 9AA

retention of replacement windows, front garden pavement and utility housing in front garden

Authority
London Borough of Merton
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Reeves K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the appeal building and the area, having particular regard to the John Innes Merton Park Conservation Area
  • whether the development includes effective provision for drainage of surface water run-off and whether it would exacerbate flood risk off-site

What decided it

The unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area caused by the replacement windows, hardstanding, and meter box enclosure, which was not outweighed by the unsubstantiated claimed benefits.

Plan policies cited: DMD2, DMD3, DMD4, CS14, D1, D4, DMF1, DMF2, CS16, SI13

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.