Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 June 20253361754

St Andrews Trading Estate Unit 2, Shoe Lane, Bridport, Dorset, DT6 3EX

Planning appeal 3361754 at St Andrews Trading Estate Unit 2, Shoe Lane, Bridport, Dorset, DT6 3EX (Dorset) was dismissed on 30 June 2025 by Inspector Marigold O, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal development would be inappropriate development within Local Green Space, having regard to the Framework and any relevant Development Plan policies, including the effect on openness.

‘proposed retention of amphibious vehicle and decking for use as an amenity area linked to the existing leisure facilities’

Authority
Dorset
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Other minor developments
Inspector
Marigold O
Postcode
DT6 3EX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the appeal development would be inappropriate development within Local Green Space, having regard to the Framework and any relevant Development Plan policies, including the effect on openness
  • whether the appeal development complies with the Council's settlement strategy, including its effect on the character and appearance of the area, which lies within the Dorset National Landscape also known as an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
  • the effect of the appeal development on the risks and impacts of flooding, including the sequential test
  • the effect of the appeal development on ecology
  • if the appeal development does amount to inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify it

What decided it

The appeal development constitutes inappropriate development within Local Green Space that fails to preserve openness, and the harm by reason of inappropriateness, combined with significant harm to character and appearance, flood risk, and ecology, is not clearly outweighed by other considerations to establish very special circumstances.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy L3Policy CF1Policy COM5Policy SUS2Policy D8Policy ENV1Policy ENV10Policy ENV12Policy ENV15Policy L1Policy ENV5Policy ENV2Policy L2Policy D10Policy COM2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

13 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Dorset

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266010776
    The Bothey, Clayford, Wimborne, BH21 7BJ
  2. Dismissed2 October 20266012115
    55, Boundary Lane, St Leonards and St Ives, BH24 2SE
  3. Dismissed24 August 20266007369
    38 Brook Lane, Corfe Mullen, BH21 3RD
  4. Dismissed12 August 20266007277
    Shady Glades, Long Lane, Wimborne, BH21 7AQ
  5. Dismissed7 August 20266007075
    The Ferns, Poole Road, Jubilee Cross, Lytchett Matravers, BH16 6AF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.