Planning appeal decision
St Andrews Trading Estate Unit 2, Shoe Lane, Bridport, Dorset, DT6 3EX
Planning appeal 3361754 at St Andrews Trading Estate Unit 2, Shoe Lane, Bridport, Dorset, DT6 3EX (Dorset) was dismissed on 30 June 2025 by Inspector Marigold O, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal development would be inappropriate development within Local Green Space, having regard to the Framework and any relevant Development Plan policies, including the effect on openness.
‘proposed retention of amphibious vehicle and decking for use as an amenity area linked to the existing leisure facilities’
- Authority
- Dorset
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- leisure-sport · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Marigold O
- Postcode
- DT6 3EX
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the appeal development would be inappropriate development within Local Green Space, having regard to the Framework and any relevant Development Plan policies, including the effect on openness
- whether the appeal development complies with the Council's settlement strategy, including its effect on the character and appearance of the area, which lies within the Dorset National Landscape also known as an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
- the effect of the appeal development on the risks and impacts of flooding, including the sequential test
- the effect of the appeal development on ecology
- if the appeal development does amount to inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify it
What decided it
The appeal development constitutes inappropriate development within Local Green Space that fails to preserve openness, and the harm by reason of inappropriateness, combined with significant harm to character and appearance, flood risk, and ecology, is not clearly outweighed by other considerations to establish very special circumstances.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy L3Policy CF1Policy COM5Policy SUS2Policy D8Policy ENV1Policy ENV10Policy ENV12Policy ENV15Policy L1Policy ENV5Policy ENV2Policy L2Policy D10Policy COM2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Dorset
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed29 October 20266010776The Bothey, Clayford, Wimborne, BH21 7BJ
- Dismissed2 October 2026601211555, Boundary Lane, St Leonards and St Ives, BH24 2SE
- Dismissed24 August 2026600736938 Brook Lane, Corfe Mullen, BH21 3RD
- Dismissed12 August 20266007277Shady Glades, Long Lane, Wimborne, BH21 7AQ
- Dismissed7 August 20266007075The Ferns, Poole Road, Jubilee Cross, Lytchett Matravers, BH16 6AF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®