Planning appeal decision
New Barn Farm , Temple Guiting , Cheltenham , GL54 5RW
Planning appeal 3362067 at New Barn Farm , Temple Guiting , Cheltenham , GL54 5RW (Cotswold District Council) was dismissed on 26 January 2026 by Inspector Fish A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Temple Guiting Conservation Area.
‘Full planning application for the conversion of a traditional barn to residential use and the erection of five new-build residential dwellings, the provision of landscaping, demolition of six existing agricultural barns and associated works ’
- Authority
- Cotswold District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Fish A
- Postcode
- GL54 5RW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Temple Guiting Conservation Area
- the effect of the proposal on the setting and significance of the roadside barn, a non-designated heritage asset
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the Cotswolds National Landscape
What decided it
The harm to the character and appearance of the Temple Guiting Conservation Area and the Cotswolds National Landscape, taken together, constitute a strong reason for refusing the development that engages the heritage and landscape protections in the Framework and outweighs the moderate public benefits of housing delivery and economic growth.
The moderate collective public benefits of housing delivery, economic benefits, conservation of the non-designated heritage asset, biodiversity net gain, and M4(2) compliant dwellings do not outweigh the less than substantial harm to the conservation area and limited harm to the national landscape, given the great weight afforded to heritage and landscape conservation by the Framework.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DS3Policy EN1Policy EN2Policy EN4Policy EN5Policy EN10Policy EN11Policy EN12
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 85Paragraph 208Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 215Paragraph 216
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Cotswold
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed29 October 20266010613Land Rear of 88 Chesterton Lane, Cirencester, GL7 1YD
- Allowed13 October 20266007597Kilkeney Inn, Andoversford, Cheltenham, GL54 4LN
- Dismissed6 October 20266010770100 Gloucester Road, Cirencester, GL7 2LW
- Allowed30 September 20266009635Stratton House Hotel, Gloucester Road, Stratton, GL7 2LE
- Dismissed30 September 20266009631Stratton House Hotel, Gloucester Road, Stratton, GL7 2LE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®