Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld19 June 20263362222

Ine By Taku, 16 Hampstead High Street, LONDON, NW3 1PX

without planning permission: installation of an external shutter box and metal roller shutter to the shopfront

Authority
London Borough of Camden
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Ollerenshaw M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the steps required by the enforcement notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach of planning control
  • Whether the period given for compliance with the notice falls short of what should reasonably be allowed

What decided it

The appellant failed to demonstrate that either the steps required or the compliance period were unreasonable, and the notice's requirements were proportionate to remedying the breach.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.