Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed5 February 20263362229

Bantham Farm, London Road, Hurst Green, East Sussex, TN19 7QY

Planning appeal 3362229 at Bantham Farm, London Road, Hurst Green, East Sussex, TN19 7QY (Rother District Council) was allowed on 5 February 2026 by Inspector Felgate J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Appeal A: whether the appeal site is a suitable location for a development of the type now proposed, having regard to the relevant planning policies relating to the location of new housing and its accessibility by sustainable modes of transport; the effects of the development on the character and appearance of the High Weald National Landscape; and whether the proposed new dwelling would be able to provide satisfactory external amenity space for its future occupants.

described in the application as: ”Construction of carbon-negative live- work unit, by conversion of existing stable barn and stables to form an eco-home. Addition of landscape and biodiversity enhancements to the wider site, and retention of the existing access

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Minor general industry/storage/warehousing
Inspector
Felgate J
Postcode
TN19 7QY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Appeal A: whether the appeal site is a suitable location for a development of the type now proposed, having regard to the relevant planning policies relating to the location of new housing and its accessibility by sustainable modes of transport; the effects of the development on the character and appearance of the High Weald National Landscape; and whether the proposed new dwelling would be able to provide satisfactory external amenity space for its future occupants.
  • Appeal B: the effects of the development on the character and quality of the High Weald National Landscape; and whether the development would accord with relevant planning policies which seek to limit development in the countryside to that which is necessary.

What decided it

Appeal A: the development's isolated and unsustainable location conflicts with both development plan policies and key NPPF policies (paragraphs 84 and 110) directing development to sustainable locations, and this conflict significantly and demonstrably outweighs the scheme's minor benefits. Appeal B: the building causes no discernible impact on the High Weald National Landscape and has been shown to be reasonably necessary for the site's needs in accordance with Policy RA3.

Appeal A: the benefits of housing delivery, ecological enhancements and carbon negativity were outweighed by the conflict with development plan policies and key NPPF policies on sustainable locations; the tilted balance did not apply because the proposal conflicts with NPPF paragraphs 84 and 110. Appeal B: no balancing exercise was required as the proposal accords with the development plan and causes no material harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Core Strategy Policy OSS1Core Strategy Policy OSS2Core Strategy Policy RA2Core Strategy Policy RA3Core Strategy Policy TR3Core Strategy Policy EN1Core Strategy Policy EN3Development and Site Allocations Local Plan Policy DIM2Development and Site Allocations Local Plan Policy DEN2Development and Site Allocations Local Plan Policy DHG7Core Strategy Policy OSS4Ticehurst Neighbourhood Plan Policy H1Ticehurst Neighbourhood Plan Policy R1Ticehurst Neighbourhood Plan Policy H5
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 84Paragraph 110Paragraph 187Paragraph 189

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

29 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Rother District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed21 August 20263352368
    The Barn, Woodmans Rest, Bluemans Lane, Westfield, TN33 0SE
  2. Quashed On Legal Grounds13 July 20263351398
    Sowdens Gate Wood , Udimore Road , Udimore, East Sussex, TN31 6BG
  3. Notice varied and upheld13 July 20263350405
    Chestnut Wood, Udimore Road, Broad Oak, Rye, East Sussex, TN31 6EU
  4. Notice upheld24 June 20263353014
    Glebelands, Potmans Lane, Catsfield, East Sussex, TN33 9BH
  5. Notice varied and upheld22 June 20263351367
    Land at Bois De Saussac, Udimore Road , Udimore, Rye, Easy Sussex, TN31 6BG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.