Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed7 August 20253362266

E P M C, 251 Bromley Road, London, SE6 2RA

Planning appeal 3362266 at E P M C, 251 Bromley Road, London, SE6 2RA (London Borough of Lewisham) was allowed on 7 August 2025 by Inspector Rafiq F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would result in an unacceptable loss of employment floorspace.

the change of use from office (Use Class E) to large house of multiple occupation (Use Class Sui Generis) and enlargement of windows in the rear elevation

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Rafiq F
Postcode
SE6 2RA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would result in an unacceptable loss of employment floorspace
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of future occupiers with regards to noise and disturbance
  • whether the proposed development would make adequate provision to restrict future occupiers from applying for parking permits and secure a financial contribution for the loss of employment floorspace

What decided it

The fallback position of prior approval for residential conversion, which would also result in loss of employment floorspace, was afforded significant weight and outweighed the policy conflict on employment loss.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
DM Policy 11Core Strategy Policies 5 and 6DM Policy 32Local Plan Policy 29Policy E2 of The London PlanPolicies D13 and D14 of The London PlanPolicies 5 and 6 of the Lewisham Core StrategyPolicy T6 of The London Plan
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 135

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

366 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Lewisham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed23 October 20266013784
    58a Manor Park, Hither Green, London, SE13 5RL
  2. Allowed11 September 20266004929
    1 - 3A Doggett Road, London, SE6 4PZ
  3. Dismissed4 September 20266010822
    Land Adjacent to 115 Loampit Vale, London, SE13 7TG
  4. Dismissed8 July 20266005937
    1 A Harcourt Road, London, SE4 2AJ
  5. Allowed20 March 20263375896
    62 to 72, Ladywell Road, London, SE13 7HS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.