Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 August 20253362548

Bickham Farm, Yelverton, Plymouth, PL6 7BJ

Planning appeal 3362548 at Bickham Farm, Yelverton, Plymouth, PL6 7BJ (Dartmoor) was dismissed on 5 August 2025 by Inspector Nicholls H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effects of the proposal on Best and Most Versatile agricultural land.

Proposed siting of an earth bank lined slurry lagoon

Authority
Dartmoor
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
agricultural · Other minor developments
Inspector
Nicholls H
Postcode
PL6 7BJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effects of the proposal on Best and Most Versatile agricultural land
  • whether the proposal would conserve and enhance the Tamar Valley National Landscape
  • the effects of the proposal on the Shaugh Prior Woods SSSI, South Dartmoor Woods SAC, Tamar Tavy Estuary SSSI, Plymouth Sound and Estuaries SAC and Grenofen Wood and West Down SSSI
  • whether the proposal would be served by adequate means of surface water drainage
  • whether the proposal would incorporate adequate carbon reduction measures

What decided it

The proposal's failure to conserve and enhance the Tamar Valley National Landscape, its potential to harm the integrity of SACs and SSSIs through unassessed in-combination ammonia effects, and its lack of adequate carbon reduction measures collectively conflicted with the development plan such that the benefits could not outweigh the harm.

the benefits of supporting the farming operation and economic considerations did not outweigh the conflicts with the development plan regarding landscape harm, ecological integrity and carbon reduction

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SPT1(3)(iv)Policy DEV2(6)Policy TTV26(2)(v)Policy TTV26(2)(vi)Policy DEV23Policy DEV25Policy DEV2Policy DEV26Policy DEV32Policy DEV35Policy SP1.1Policy SP1.2
Judgments
Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823; Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [1982]

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

4 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Dartmoor

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed16 July 20253354983
    Barn Opposite Meavy Barton, Meavy, Yelverton, Devon, PL20 6PJ
  2. Allowed27 January 20253345781
    Land at Linhay Hill, Ashburton, New Abbot, Devon, TQ13 7UP
  3. Dismissed11 November 20243329333
    Primms Cottage, Poundsgate, Newton Abbot, TQ13 7PR
  4. Dismissed13 September 20243334395
    Land at Timbers Road, Buckfastleigh, TQ11 0DW
  5. Dismissed13 September 20243334393
    Land at Timbers Road, Buckfastleigh, TQ11 0DW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.