Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 July 20253362992

48-50 Sydenham Road, Croydon, CR0 2EF

construction of a three-storey building (following demolition of garages) to form 6 self-contained flats; private amenity space; communal amenity space; refuse/recycle and cycle provision; hard and soft landscaping and boundary treatment

Authority
London Borough of Croydon
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Gardner L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the development would provide its occupants with acceptable living conditions, with regard to outlook, daylight, outdoor amenity space and accessibility
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupants of 48 Sydenham Road, with particular regard to outlook and privacy
  • the effect of the proposal on protected species, with particular regard to bats
  • the effect of the proposal on the highway network including whether the proposal would make adequate provision for any additional need for sustainable transport improvement arising from the development
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The cumulative harm to living conditions of future and neighbouring occupiers, combined with unmitigated impacts on protected species and failure to secure sustainable transport measures, outweighed the moderate benefits of delivering six homes in a sustainable location.

Framework references: 58

Plan policies cited: Policy DM10, Policy SP4, Policy DM28, Policy SP8, Policy DM29, Policy SP2, Policy D7, Policy D6, Policy D3, Policy D4, Policy D8, Policy G7, Policy T4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.