Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 October 20253363250

Flat D, 41 Hargrave Road, LONDON, N19 5SH

‘Proposed part second floor rear extension’

Authority
London Borough of Islington
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Burley P

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the appeal scheme has incorporated sustainable design measures
  • the effect of the appeal scheme on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to daylight and sunlight to, and outlook from, 43 Hargrave Road
  • the effect of the appeal scheme on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The absence of a required Sustainable Design and Construction Statement and the failure to adequately demonstrate that the extension would not cause unacceptable harm to neighbouring daylight, sunlight and outlook meant the scheme conflicted with the development plan with no material considerations to outweigh this.

Plan policies cited: SDMP Policy S2, SDMP Policy PLAN1, London Plan Policy D3, London Plan Policy D4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.