Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed30 June 20253363484

34 Somerset Road, LONDON, N18 1HG

rear dormer and outrigger dormer with front rooflights

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Jones M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the appeal dwelling and the surrounding area
  • the effect of the development on the living conditions of the residents at 32 Somerset Road with particular regard to outlook and light
  • whether any material considerations outweigh any conflict with the development plan

What decided it

The fallback position under permitted development rights, which would result in substantially similar harm, justified allowing the appeal notwithstanding the development plan conflict.

Plan policies cited: Policy CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy (2010), Policy DMD8 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014), Policy DMD13 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014), Policy DMD37 of the Enfield Development Management Document (2014), Policy D4 of the London Plan (2021)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.