Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld27 July 20263363488

Normans Hall Chelford Road, Prestbury, Macclesfield, SK10 4PT

Planning appeal 3363488 at Normans Hall Chelford Road, Prestbury, Macclesfield, SK10 4PT (Cheshire East) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 27 July 2026 by Inspector Phillips A, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the matter alleged in the enforcement notice does not constitute a breach of planning control (ground (c)).

Extensions to the main house comprising a boot room, subterranean leisure suite and a link corridor; erection of a glazed loggia, dormer window and alterations to the converted shippon; erection of garage block and greenhouse; alterations to access gate, driveway and boundary walls; removal and erection of retaining walls, landscaping and regrading of land; retention of timber fence adjoining the eastern boundary of the site

Authority
Cheshire East
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Phillips A
Postcode
SK10 4PT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the matter alleged in the enforcement notice does not constitute a breach of planning control (ground (c))
  • Whether the time given to comply with the requirements is too short (ground (g))
  • Whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework
  • The effect on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including the land within it
  • The effect on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the development would preserve the setting of the Grade II Listed Building, Normans Hall, and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses
  • If the development is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The additional height of the fence above the 2-metre permitted development threshold caused Green Belt, character and appearance, and heritage harm that was not clearly outweighed by other considerations, so no very special circumstances existed to justify the fence.

Substantial weight was given to the harm from inappropriate development in the Green Belt, together with harm to openness, character and appearance, and the setting of the listed building; these harms were not clearly outweighed by other considerations (including the limited-weight fallback position), so no very special circumstances existed and permission/listed building consent for the fence was refused, while the extensions were allowed as very special circumstances were common ground for those works.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy PG3Policy GEN1Policy ENV3Policy SE1Policy SE4Policy SD2Policy SE7Policy HER1Policy HER4Policy SE3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154Paragraph 213
Judgments
Steer v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Catesby Estates Limited, Amber Valley Borough Council [2018] EWCA Civ 1697

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

47 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Cheshire East

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed27 October 20266004692
    Land Adjoining Jenny Heyes, Heyes Lane, Alderley Edge, SK9 7LH
  2. Dismissed13 October 20266009638
    The Smithy, Adlington Road, Wilmslow, SK9 2LN
  3. Allowed5 October 20266008576
    Land At Racecourse Road - Greaves Road, Racecourse Road - Greaves Road, Wilmslow, SK9 5LW
  4. Allowed2 October 20266010578
    Land at Dunvilles Farm, Bollington Lane, Chelford Road, Monks Heath, Macclesfield, SK10 4UL
  5. Dismissed30 September 20266010213
    Disley Meadow, Lower Greenshall Lane, Disley, SK12 2HH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.