Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed11 November 20253363575

257-283 Ilderton Road, Southwark, London, SE15 1NS

demolition of the existing building and mixed use redevelopment of the site comprising Purpose-Built Student Housing including associated amenity and ancillary café and cycle workshop (Use Class Sui Generis), a new self-storage facility (Use Class B8), light Industrial workspace / incubator units (Use Class E(g)(iii)) and other associated infrastructure

Authority
London Borough of Southwark
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Other Major Developments
Inspector
Owen A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether a payment in lieu (PIL) to affordable housing, instead of on-site or off-site provision, would be appropriate
  • whether the proposal contributes to a mixed and inclusive community with regard to the mix of uses proposed, the mix of uses locally including other student accommodation, the proximity to infrastructure, and other development plan priorities

What decided it

The Inspector's finding that exceptional circumstances (AAP phasing and design constraints, and a PIL equivalent to 35% affordable housing) robustly justified a payment in lieu instead of on-site/off-site affordable housing provision.

The constraints on delivering affordable housing on- or off-site, combined with a payment in lieu equivalent to the 35% policy requirement, were found to amount to exceptional circumstances that outweighed the identified policy conflict, resulting in overall accordance with the development plan.

Framework references: 64

Plan policies cited: Policy P5, Policy P1, Policy H15, Policy SP2, Policy AAP 4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.