Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent to Pear Tree PH, Winchester Road, Southampton, Hampshire, SO32 2DH
Planning appeal 3363580 at Land Adjacent to Pear Tree PH, Winchester Road, Southampton, Hampshire, SO32 2DH (Eastleigh Borough Council) was dismissed on 26 January 2026 by Inspector Tucker A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether there would be a significant effect on the internationally important features of the Solent Complex of European protected sites, or the New Forest Special Protection Area, Special Area of Conservation and Ramsar sites.
erection of 6 dwellings, associated parking and creation of new access
- Authority
- Eastleigh Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Tucker A
- Postcode
- SO32 2DH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether there would be a significant effect on the internationally important features of the Solent Complex of European protected sites, or the New Forest Special Protection Area, Special Area of Conservation and Ramsar sites
- whether the site is suitably located for the development proposed with regard to the development plan
- the effect of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposal upon the operation or viability of the Pear Tree Inn Public House (PH)
- whether the proposal would secure acceptable living conditions for its future occupants in respect of noise
- whether the proposal makes provision for securing biodiversity net gain
What decided it
The proposal would not satisfy the Habitats Regulations with regard to the New Forest Special Protection Area, Special Area of Conservation and Ramsar sites because the submitted mitigation strategy does not accord with Natural England's evidenced position on the required level of Suitable Alternative Natural Green Space provision.
The benefits of delivering 6 dwellings and various economic benefits could not outweigh the findings regarding breach of the Habitats Regulations.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM11Policy S5Policy DM1Policy DM36Policy DM8
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 135Paragraph 200Paragraph 88Paragraph 98
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Eastleigh
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed12 December 202533681601 Gatcombe Gardens, West End , Hampshire, SO18 3NA
- Dismissed26 August 20253361240Ropley, Botley Road, West End, Hampshire, SO30 3HA
- Allowed15 August 20253357650Aldi Foodstore, Unit 1 Hedge End Retail Park, Charles Watts Way, Hampshire, SO30 4RT
- Dismissed26 September 20243338792Brighstone Botley Road, Horton Heath, Eastleigh, SO50 7DT
- Dismissed12 June 20243324228Hound Road, Netley, Southampton, SO31 5FS
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®