Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent to the Duke of Wellington, Wellington Place, Cooks Wharf, Marsworth, Bucks, LU7 9AD
Planning appeal 3363581 at Land Adjacent to the Duke of Wellington, Wellington Place, Cooks Wharf, Marsworth, Bucks, LU7 9AD (Buckinghamshire Council - Aylesbury Area *) was dismissed on 6 October 2025 by Inspector Hughes L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would be in a suitable location for housing, having regard to the spatial strategy including access to services and facilities.
outline planning application with all matters reserved except access and layout for the erection of 9 dwellings with associated parking and access
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Hughes L
- Postcode
- LU7 9AD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would be in a suitable location for housing, having regard to the spatial strategy including access to services and facilities
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- whether the proposed development would provide sufficient Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG)
- whether the proposed development should provide for affordable housing
- the effect of the proposed development on drainage and flood risk
What decided it
The combination of significant harm from pedestrian safety conflicts, unsustainable location, lack of affordable housing, insufficient biodiversity net gain, inadequate drainage information, and unmitigated effects on a Habitats Site outweighed the benefits of 9 new dwellings, particularly given the site's location in a hamlet unidentified in the settlement strategy.
The benefits of 9 new dwellings and their contribution to housing need and economic benefits were outweighed by the combination of significant harm to pedestrian safety, unsustainability due to private car reliance, absence of affordable housing, unsatisfactory biodiversity net gain and drainage provision, minor harm to character and appearance, and unmitigated effects on the Chiltern Beechwoods SAC.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S1Policy S2Policy S3Policy T1Policy T4Policy T5Policy BE2Policy BE4Policy NE4Policy H1Policy NE1Policy I4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 73Paragraph 83Paragraph 115Paragraph 116Paragraph 117Paragraph 135Paragraph 177Paragraph 187
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Buckinghamshire Council - Aylesbury Area
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed31 March 20263372565Land South Of Bourton Road, Buckingham, Buckinghamshire, MK18 7DR
- Allowed12 February 20263375226Ladymead Farm, Denham, Quainton, Buckinghamshire, HP22 4AN
- Allowed2 February 20263370338Land South of Drayton Road, Newton Leys, Buckinghamshire, MK3 5RG
- Allowed14 January 20263372885Land to the South of Bishopstone (Adjoining Plantation), Kimblewick Road, Dinton, Buckinghamshire, HP17 8
- Allowed5 December 20253364628Land East of Aylesbury Road, Ledburn, LU7 0QD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®