Planning appeal decision
35 The Caravan, Tong Forge, Shifnal, Telford, Shropshire, TF11 8QD
Planning appeal 3363600 at 35 The Caravan, Tong Forge, Shifnal, Telford, Shropshire, TF11 8QD (Shropshire County Council) was allowed on 8 September 2025 by Inspector Madge M, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development carried out or proposed is inappropriate in the Green Belt.
change of use of land to Gypsy/Traveller Site consisting of four family pitches to include 4No. static caravans, 4No. touring caravans, 4No. amenity blocks with gravel drive and turning area. Appeal
- Authority
- Shropshire County Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
- Inspector
- Madge M
- Postcode
- TF11 8QD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development carried out or proposed is inappropriate in the Green Belt
- If the developments are inappropriate in the Green Belt, their effect on openness
- The developments' effect on the character and appearance of the rural landscape of the countryside
- If necessary, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the necessary very special circumstances required to justify inappropriate development in the Green Belt
What decided it
The development was found not to be inappropriate in the Green Belt (falling within paragraph 154(f)/155 exceptions as grey belt land) and the Council could not demonstrate a five-year supply of deliverable traveller pitches, creating an immediate unmet need.
Negligible harm from intentional unauthorised development and conflict with policy MD6, together with neutral/mitigable harm to character and appearance, were clearly outweighed by significant weight given to compliance with policies CS5 and CS12 and to the immediate lack of suitable alternative sites, so the balance favoured allowing both appeals.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS5Policy CS12Policy MD6Policy MD12Policy CS17
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Shropshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed11 September 20266010260Land to East of Old Shackerley Lane, Old Shackerley Lane, Albrighton, WV7 3AB
- Allowed11 August 20266006953Land West of Woodhill Road, Highley, WV16 6HT
- Allowed7 July 20263378204Orchard Cottage, Ashford Carbonell, Shropshire, SY8 4BX
- Dismissed22 April 20266004400The New Bungalow, A442 From Lodge Farm To Chapel Lane Quatford, Quatford, Bridgnorth, Shropshire, WV15 6QJ
- Dismissed22 April 20266001790Montgomery Waters, Shrewsbury Road, Church Stretton, Shropshire, SY6 6HD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®