Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed3 November 20253363735

38 Rounton Road,, Church Crookham, Fleet, Hampshire, GU52 6HB

Planning appeal 3363735 at 38 Rounton Road,, Church Crookham, Fleet, Hampshire, GU52 6HB (Hart District Council) was allowed on 3 November 2025 by Inspector Ellis G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, with specific regard to the site frontage.

the demolition of existing dwelling and outbuildings and erection of three detached dwellings, associated car and cycle parking, frontage planting and access works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Ellis G
Postcode
GU52 6HB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, with specific regard to the site frontage
  • the effects of the proposal on Biodiversity and the Thames Basin Heath Special Protection Area (TBH SPA)

What decided it

The proposal accords with the development plan as a whole and the Council cannot demonstrate a five-year housing supply, triggering a presumption in favour of sustainable development which is not displaced by any identified conflicts with the development plan.

No balancing exercise was undertaken as the proposal accords with the development plan and no conflicts were identified; the presumption in favour of sustainable development applies due to the lack of five-year housing supply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy NBE9Policy GEN1Policy NBE4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

78 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Hart

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed30 July 20263375985
    Park and Ride, Elvetham Heath Way, Fleet, Hampshire, GU51 1HG
  2. Allowed13 February 20266002947
    Highbank, Copse Lane, Long Sutton, Hampshire, RG29 1SX
  3. Allowed27 January 20263372608
    Grey House Mount Pleasant, Hartley Wintney, Hook, RG27 8PW
  4. Allowed18 December 20256000602
    2 Chantreyland, New Road, Eversley, Hampshire, RG27 0PA
  5. Allowed18 December 20256000601
    1 Chantreyland, New Road, Eversley, Hampshire, RG27 0PA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.