Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 August 20253363985

Go Glass, 127 Cherry Hinton Road, Cambridge, CB1 7BS

Planning appeal 3363985 at Go Glass, 127 Cherry Hinton Road, Cambridge, CB1 7BS (Cambridge City Council) was dismissed on 11 August 2025 by Inspector Kemmann-Lane T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the immediate setting of the site and the wider character and appearance of the area.

part demolition of existing premises and the conversion into a single dwelling house along with the erection of 3 No. 1 bedroom dwellings to the rear accessed from Derby Road

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Kemmann-Lane T
Postcode
CB1 7BS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the immediate setting of the site and the wider character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposed dwellings would provide satisfactory external living accommodation for future occupiers

What decided it

The proposal's incongruous appearance within the narrow historic streetscene of Derby Road, combined with inadequate external living spaces, meant it failed to secure well-designed places and could not overcome the tilted balance despite the housing land shortfall.

the adverse impacts of incongruous design and inadequate external living spaces significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing delivery in a sustainable location and the need to address the housing land shortfall

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 55Policy 56Policy 57Policy 59
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

144 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Cambridge

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed14 October 20266012507
    21 Earl Street, Cambridge, CB1 1JR
  2. Dismissed14 October 20266008906
    Land At The Rear Of 31 Neale Close, Cambridge, CB1 3LE
  3. Dismissed13 October 20266009980
    2 Cranleigh Close, Trumpington, Cambridge, CB2 9NP
  4. Dismissed8 October 20266010726
    127 Histon Road, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB4 3JD
  5. Dismissed30 September 20266012281
    Pavement at East Road, Cambridge, CB1 1BH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.