Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 October 20253364259

21 Lavidge Road, Eltham, Greenwich, SE9 3NE

demolition of existing garage store and erection of a new detached 4 - bed dwelling house with car parking and associated works

Authority
Royal Borough of Greenwich
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Harrison M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the living conditions of future occupants, specifically in relation to accessibility

What decided it

The long-lasting harm to character and appearance caused by the overly bulky and top-heavy roof form and rear dormer significantly and demonstrably outweighed the minor benefits of one additional dwelling, even in the context of the Council's inability to demonstrate a 5-year housing land supply.

The benefits of one additional dwelling and support for housing supply were outweighed by the significant and demonstrable harm to character and appearance; the tilted balance under NPPF paragraph 11(d) did not favour the proposal.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy D3 of the London Plan, Policy D7 of the London Plan, Policy DH1 of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed Policies, Policy H5 of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed Policies

Judgments cited: Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin); Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982 P37]

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.