Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 September 20253364606

6 Station Approach, Hoe Street, London, E17 9QF

Planning appeal 3364606 at 6 Station Approach, Hoe Street, London, E17 9QF (Waltham Forest London Borough Council) was dismissed on 25 September 2025 by Inspector Lawrence R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on highway and pedestrian safety, including whether there would be suitable servicing arrangements and having regard to the Outline Construction Logistics Plan.

Demolition of vehicle servicing garage and construction of a part one/part three-storey building to provide 7 residential units (Use Class C3), 8 retail/commercial units (Use Class E) and a management office with associated bicycle, and refuse/recycling storage, and hard/soft landscaping

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Lawrence R
Postcode
E17 9QF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on highway and pedestrian safety, including whether there would be suitable servicing arrangements and having regard to the Outline Construction Logistics Plan
  • the effect of the development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers at 2 to 26 Priory Avenue, with particular regard to outlook
  • whether the proposal would provide a suitable standard of accommodation for future occupiers in terms of external private amenity space
  • whether the proposal makes adequate provision for waste and refuse
  • the effect of the construction phase on highway safety
  • whether a Section 106 agreement and the obligations therein are necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms, directly related to the development and are fairly related in scale and kind

What decided it

The substantial and cumulative harm arising from highway safety concerns, adverse impacts on neighbouring living conditions, inadequate private amenity space for future residents, and the absence of a completed Section 106 agreement to secure necessary obligations clearly outweighed the modest benefits of the scheme.

The substantial harm from highway safety concerns, neighbouring amenity impacts, and inadequate residential standards outweighed the modest benefits of housing delivery on brownfield land in a sustainable location, with limited weight afforded to brownfield reuse given the cumulative harm identified.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 57Policy 61Policy 62Policy 63Policy 64Policy 65Policy 66Policy 81Policy 85Policy 93Policy 56London Plan Policy D6London Plan Policy T7
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 125

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

511 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Waltham Forest London Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed22 October 20266011485
    Land Adjoining 120 Warner Road, Walthamstow, London, E17 7DZ
  2. Allowed20 October 20266013085
    53 Badlis Road, London, E17 5LG
  3. Dismissed29 September 20266012954
    Unit 1, 6 - 10, Central Parade, 137 Hoe Street, Walthamstow, London, E17 4RT
  4. Dismissed29 September 20266012953
    Unit 1, 6 - 10, Central Parade, 137 Hoe Street, Walthamstow, London, E17 4RT
  5. Dismissed28 September 20266011926
    220 Hoe Street, Walthamstow, London, E17 3AY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.