Planning appeal decision
Land Off A34 Opposite George & Dragon PH, Stone Road , Meaford, Staffordshire , ST15 0PX
Planning appeal 3364648 at Land Off A34 Opposite George & Dragon PH, Stone Road , Meaford, Staffordshire , ST15 0PX (Stafford Borough Council) was dismissed on 30 June 2025 by Inspector Raygen Z, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
creation of an Electric Vehicle Charging Hub comprising 31 charging bays equipped with solar panels and a substation (Sui Generis), picnic areas and a drive-through restaurant (Use Class E), with associated access, car and cycle parking, and landscaping
- Authority
- Stafford Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- utilities-energy · Minor retail and services
- Inspector
- Raygen Z
- Postcode
- ST15 0PX
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and the setting of the Meaford Conservation Area
- whether the appeal site can be suitably and safely accessed by sustainable travel
- whether the proposal makes adequate provision for car parking
- If the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would harm openness and character, with highway safety concerns for pedestrians, and the environmental and economic benefits do not clearly outweigh these harms to constitute very special circumstances.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP7Policy N1Policy N8Policy N9Policy T2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 112Paragraph 115Paragraph 116Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Stafford
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed7 September 20266010165The Ferns, 6 Broc Hill Way, Brocton, ST17 0UB
- Allowed13 July 20266007153Land at Willow Farm, Sandon Road, Sharpley Heath, ST15 8SL
- Allowed10 July 202660089631-3 Radford Street, Stone, ST15 8DA
- Dismissed6 July 20266007489One Brancote Row, Baswich Lane, Stafford, ST18 0YD
- Allowed15 June 20266007019Land Adjacent to Higher Gorsty Birch Farm, Stallington Road, Blythe Bridge, ST11 9QH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®