Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 June 20263364720

The Filter House, Hayeswater Gill Valley, Hartsop, CA11 0NZ

use of Filter House, as a dwelling in the form of a holiday home

Authority
Lake District
Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Franks Z

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the Authority's decision to refuse to grant a certificate of lawful use or development was well-founded

What decided it

The requirement for occupants to sleep in a tent and caravans inside the building demonstrated that the building did not afford all facilities required for day-to-day private domestic existence and therefore could not be classified as a dwellinghouse.

Judgments cited: Gravesham BC v SSE & O'Brien [1983]; Impey v SSE & Lake District SPB [1981] JPL 363; Backer v SSE & Camden LBC [1983] JPL 167; Macmillan and Co. Ltd v Rees (1946) 1 All ER 675

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.