Planning appeal decision
The Filter House, Hayeswater Gill Valley, Hartsop, CA11 0NZ
use of Filter House, as a dwelling in the form of a holiday home
- Authority
- Lake District
- Appeal type
- ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Franks Z
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the Authority's decision to refuse to grant a certificate of lawful use or development was well-founded
What decided it
The requirement for occupants to sleep in a tent and caravans inside the building demonstrated that the building did not afford all facilities required for day-to-day private domestic existence and therefore could not be classified as a dwellinghouse.
Judgments cited: Gravesham BC v SSE & O'Brien [1983]; Impey v SSE & Lake District SPB [1981] JPL 363; Backer v SSE & Camden LBC [1983] JPL 167; Macmillan and Co. Ltd v Rees (1946) 1 All ER 675
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®