Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 September 20253364764

334-336 Essex Road, London, N1 3PB

the erection of a two-storey dwellinghouse

Authority
London Borough of Islington
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Armstrong N

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the East Canonbury Conservation Area and its effect on the setting of the Locally Listed Buildings at 324-338 (even) Essex Road
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupants of neighbouring properties, with reference to outlook and privacy
  • whether the proposed development would comply with sustainable design standards

What decided it

The proposal would fail to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the conservation area and would cause less than substantial harm to its significance, which could not be outweighed by the modest public benefits of delivering a single dwelling.

Framework references: 212, 215

Plan policies cited: Policy D3, Policy D4, Policy HC1, Policy PLAN1, Policy DH1, Policy DH2, Policy S1, Policy S2, Policy S3, Policy S4, Policy S5, Policy S6, Policy S7, Policy S8, Policy S9, Policy S10

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.