Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed17 October 20253365145

93 High Street, Enfield, Middx, EN3 4EE

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Armstrong N

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the condition requiring cycle parking is necessary or reasonable to increase the use of active and sustainable transport modes

What decided it

The original condition imposed higher cycle parking standards than required by London Plan Policy T5, making it unreasonable, but a modified condition requiring 2 long-stay spaces would accord with the policy and meet all statutory tests.

Framework references: 57, 109

Plan policies cited: Policy T5 of The London Plan (2021), Policy DMD 8, Policy DMD 37, Policy DMD 45, Policy DMD 47

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.