Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld29 October 20253365198

65-69 Amhurst Park, LONDON, N16 5DL

Authority
London Borough of Hackney
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
community-institutional · Change of use
Inspector
Pleasant L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the Council behaved unreasonably in refusing to accept that the test in Policy LP24(vi) is satisfied
  • Whether the Council behaved unreasonably in the late submission of evidence regarding Charedi Jewish school permissions
  • Whether the Council failed to engage cooperatively with the Applicant in relation to conditions and the section 106 planning obligation

What decided it

The Inspector found that the Council's conduct in testing the appellant's case, responding to evidence, and engaging on conditions and the s106 obligation did not amount to unreasonable behaviour under the PPG.

Plan policies cited: Policy LP24(vi)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.