Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 September 20253365202

Shams Farm Shakerley Lane, Atherton, Manchester, M46 9TZ

Planning appeal 3365202 at Shams Farm Shakerley Lane, Atherton, Manchester, M46 9TZ (Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 30 September 2025 by Inspector Smith J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed access point of the development would provide a safe access arrangement.

outline application for residential development of up to 31 dwellinghouses, seeking approval of access all other matters reserved

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Smith J
Postcode
M46 9TZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed access point of the development would provide a safe access arrangement

What decided it

The unacceptable impact on highway safety arising from the proposed access arrangement along Shakerley Lane, where increased traffic would create conflict between motorised and non-vehicular users in a narrow, poorly lit, unadopted road with no defensible space for pedestrians.

The moderate and limited positive weight afforded to housing delivery and economic benefits was significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the significant weight attributed to the unacceptable harm to highway safety.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CP7 of the Wigan Local Plan 2013Policy JP-C5 of the Places for Everyone Joint Development Plan 2022 to 2039Policy JP-C6 of the Places for Everyone Joint Development Plan 2022 to 2039Policy JP-C8 of the Places for Everyone Joint Development Plan 2022 to 2039
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 116

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

19 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wigan

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed26 October 20266015009
    34 Knightcliffe Cresent, Appley Bridge, Wigan, wn68dx
  2. Allowed7 October 20266012011
    15 Foxglove Close, Standish, Wigan, WN6 0QN
  3. Dismissed30 September 20266012182
    25 Chandler Way, Lowton, Wigan, WA3 2LR
  4. Dismissed25 September 20266008026
    3 Kimberley Street, Wigan, WN6 7AJ
  5. Dismissed21 September 20266008977
    90 Park Road, Wigan, WN6 7AQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.