Planning appeal decision
Land at Park Lane, Cheadle, Staffs, ST10 1PD
Planning appeal 3365426 at Land at Park Lane, Cheadle, Staffs, ST10 1PD (Staffordshire Moorlands District Council) was dismissed on 4 August 2025 by Inspector Robinson N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
outline application for erection of a single dwelling including details of means of access
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Robinson N
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties on Nursery Close with particular regard to loss of outlook
- The effect of the proposal on biodiversity
- If the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt which, by definition, is harmful and can only be justified by very special circumstances; the identified benefits do not clearly outweigh the harm to the Green Belt and the countryside setting of Cheadle.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and harm to character and appearance, together with harm to the countryside setting of the historic town, was not clearly outweighed by the social and economic benefits of housing delivery and the personal circumstances of the appellant; the Green Belt protection policies provided a strong reason for refusal notwithstanding the out-of-date development plan.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SS10Policy H1Policy SS1Policy DC1Policy DC3Policy SS2Policy NE1Policy NE2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 143Paragraph 155
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Staffordshire Moorlands
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed13 October 2026601419875, Rudyard Road, Biddulph Moor, ST8 7JW
- Allowed7 September 20266011103Land Between Rudyard Road and Hot Lane, Rudyard Road, Biddulph Moor, ST8 7JL
- Dismissed18 August 20266008539Land Adjacent Fulwood, School Road, Bagnall, ST9 9JP
- Dismissed12 August 20266010932Willow House, Leek Road, Stoke-On-Trent, ST9 9QF
- Allowed15 July 20266007233Thornby Lodge, Consall Forge, Wetley Rock, ST9 0AJ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®