Planning appeal decision
1a Brighton Road, South Croydon, CR2 6EA
Planning appeal 3365570 at 1a Brighton Road, South Croydon, CR2 6EA (London Borough of Croydon) was dismissed on 24 October 2025 by Inspector De Freitas Terceiro P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including its effect on the significance of the non-designated heritage asset (NDHA).
Outline planning application for the erection of a 5 storey block comprising 25 flats and 2 commercial units (access reserved)
- Authority
- London Borough of Croydon
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- De Freitas Terceiro P
- Postcode
- CR2 6EA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including its effect on the significance of the non-designated heritage asset (NDHA)
- whether the development necessitates the provision of affordable housing, end user occupier/fit out commercial unit, air quality, carbon emission offset, energy requirements, highway works, sustainable modes of transport and promotion, and local employment and training opportunities and, if so, whether an appropriate mechanism to secure these has been secured
What decided it
The substantial harm to the significance of the non-designated heritage asset caused by the proposed building's poor design quality and lack of coherence with its historic neighbour, combined with the failure to secure a properly executed legal agreement for necessary planning obligations.
The moderate benefits of delivering 25 new apartments on a brownfield site and associated economic benefits did not outweigh the substantial harm to the character and appearance of the area and the significance of the non-designated heritage asset, and the failure to secure necessary mitigation through a valid legal agreement.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- London Plan 2021 Policy D3London Plan 2021 Policy D4London Plan 2021 Policy D6London Plan 2021 Policy H4London Plan 2021 Policy H5London Plan 2021 Policy H6London Plan 2021 Policy E11London Plan 2021 Policy SI1London Plan 2021 Policy SI2London Plan 2021 Policy T1Croydon Local Plan 2018 Policy SP2Croydon Local Plan 2018 Policy SP3Croydon Local Plan 2018 Policy SP4Croydon Local Plan 2018 Policy SP4.2Croydon Local Plan 2018 Policy SP6Croydon Local Plan 2018 Policy SP8Croydon Local Plan 2018 Policy DM4Croydon Local Plan 2018 Policy DM10Croydon Local Plan 2018 Policy DM18Croydon Local Plan 2018 Policy DM29
- Judgments
- Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823; Wheatcroft (Bernard) Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment [1982] JPL 37; North Wiltshire DC v Secretary of State for the Environment (1993) 65 P&CR 137 (CA)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Croydon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed28 October 2026601575120 Newark Road, South Croydon, CR2 6HQ
- Dismissed26 October 2026601457458 Kingswood Way, South Croydon, CR2 8QQ
- Dismissed26 October 202660131107 Quadrant Road, Thornton Heath, Croydon, CR7 7DB
- Dismissed22 October 2026601430177-81, North End, Croydon, CR0 1TJ
- Dismissed22 October 202660096413 The Spinney, Off Warren Road, Purley, CR8 1AB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®