Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed24 June 20263365584

5 Rowfant Road, London, SW17 7AP

Planning appeal 3365584 at 5 Rowfant Road, London, SW17 7AP (London Borough of Wandsworth) was allowed on 24 June 2026 by Inspector Naylor R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the decision of the Council to refuse to grant a certificate of lawful use or development was well-founded, turning on whether the proposal would be permitted development under Schedule 2, Part 1, Class B of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development)(England) Order 2015 as amended.

a l oft conversion on the outrigger roof with hip-to-gable roof and extending the existing dormer. Insertion of two roof lights on the front slope. Formal

Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Naylor R
Postcode
SW17 7AP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the decision of the Council to refuse to grant a certificate of lawful use or development was well-founded, turning on whether the proposal would be permitted development under Schedule 2, Part 1, Class B of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development)(England) Order 2015 as amended

What decided it

The existing modest rear dormer would be entirely subsumed by the proposed works and would no longer exist as a result, meaning it could not be accounted for within the resulting roof space calculations, and the proposal therefore fell within the 40 cubic metre tolerance of Class B.

What the Inspector cited

Judgments
Havering v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2017] EWHC (Admin) 1546

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

457 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Wandsworth

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266011378
    First and Second Floor Maisonette, 184 Putney Bridge Road, London, SW15 2NG
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266011258
    8 Mysore Road, London, SW11 5SB
  3. Dismissed27 October 20266010452
    72 Frensham Drive, London, SW15 3EF
  4. Allowed26 October 20266013180
    23, Sutherland Grove, London, SW18 5PS
  5. Dismissed15 October 20266014390
    5 Banbury Street,, London, SW11 3EJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.