Planning appeal decision
Land North and East of Junction 17 of the A12, Chelmsford, Essex, CM2 7TN
Planning appeal 3365696 at Land North and East of Junction 17 of the A12, Chelmsford, Essex, CM2 7TN (Chelmsford Borough Council) was dismissed on 2 July 2026 by Inspector Nunn M, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: planning policy and the spatial strategy.
commercial development of up to 120,000 sqm of logistics/warehousing development (Use Class B8 with ancillary offices) along with servicing and infrastructure including new site accesses, internal roads and footpaths, landscaping including earthworks to create development platforms and bunds, drainage features and other associated works (all matters of detail reserved)
- Authority
- Chelmsford Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- employment-industrial · Major general industry/storage/warehousing
- Inspector
- Nunn M
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- planning policy and the spatial strategy
- the effect on the character and appearance of the area, including the landscape, and protected trees
- the effect on designated and non-designated heritage assets
- the effect on highway capacity and safety; and the availability of sustainable transport options
- the need for the development
- the overall planning balance
What decided it
Unresolved highway safety and capacity concerns, particularly regarding the proposed change to the Junction 17 southbound exit slip road, weighed very substantially against the scheme and could not be safely resolved at outline stage.
The significant economic, environmental and sustainable transport benefits of the scheme did not clearly outweigh the substantial harms to landscape and protected trees, less-than-substantial heritage harm, and unresolved highway safety/capacity concerns, such that the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits under the tilted balance, and the proposal also conflicted with the development plan as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S1Policy S4Policy S6Policy S7Policy S8Policy S11Policy DM8Policy DM17
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 58Paragraph 85Paragraph 86Paragraph 87Paragraph 116Paragraph 187Paragraph 212Paragraph 215Paragraph 216
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Chelmsford City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed15 November 20243341747Land South East of Roselawn Farm, Main Road, Broomfield, Chelmsford, CM1 7AG
- Dismissed11 October 2024333331448 High Street, Chelmsford, CM1 1DE
- Allowed26 March 20243325540Church Green Cottage, High Street, Stock, Ingatestone, CM4 9BS
- Allowed26 October 2026601463316 Paradise Road, Writtle, Chelmsford, CM1 3HP
- Allowed15 October 20266008937Hawthorns, Broomwood Lane, Ramsden Heath, CM11 1JR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®