Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 October 20253365704

634 London Road, Grays, Essex, RM20 3JT

a three storey dwelling

Authority
Thurrock Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Goldberg V

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of future occupiers of the proposed dwelling or the occupiers of 634 London Road, in respect of private amenity space
  • whether the proposal would provide adequate manoeuvring space for vehicles parked at the proposed dwelling or 634 London Road
  • whether the proposal would increase flood risk at the appeal site or to third party land

What decided it

The proposal's failure to demonstrate that it would not increase flood risk, combined with substantial harms to character and appearance, private amenity space, and highway safety, outweighed the social and economic benefits of delivering a modest dwelling.

The conflicts with the development plan were afforded substantial weight; the absence of a five-year housing land supply engaged the tilted balance under NPPF paragraph 11(d), but the proposal's conflict with flood risk policies (a protected asset under footnote 7) meant the tilted balance did not apply, and the social and economic benefits did not justify a decision otherwise than in accordance with the development plan.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy CSTP22, Policy CSTP23, Policy PMD2, Policy PMD1, Policy PMD9, Policy CSTP27, Policy PMD15, Annex 1 Saved Policy 'Residential Areas' from the 1997 Local Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.