Planning appeal decision
Land West of A4135 Draycott, Cam, GL11 5LN
Planning appeal 3366140 at Land West of A4135 Draycott, Cam, GL11 5LN (Stroud District Council) was allowed on 17 November 2025 by Inspector McGlone A, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would accord with the spatial strategy in the development plan.
hybrid application for residential development up to 795 dwellings , with 226 in full application, and the balance in the outline application, with supporting infrastructure and enabling works including: new vehicular access off the A4135, public open space, landscaping and drainage infrastructure
- Authority
- Stroud District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- McGlone A
- Postcode
- GL11 5LN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would accord with the spatial strategy in the development plan
- whether the proposal would make adequate provision for affordable housing, self-build plots, public open space, education, libraries, highway improvements, public transport, travel plan, health facilities, policing, TROs and monitoring fees in respect of highway improvements, libraries, education, public transport, travel plan, and TROs
- the effect of the development proposed on the character and appearance of the area, having regard to density, layout and the scale of the dwellings
- whether the proposed development would offer suitable green infrastructure and connectivity
What decided it
The very substantial benefit of delivering market, affordable and self-build housing in a district unable to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply outweighed the limited harm arising from conflict with the development plan's spatial strategy.
the very substantial benefits of housing delivery (including affordable and self-build homes), together with moderate economic, biodiversity net gain and infrastructure benefits, were not significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the limited harm from conflict with the spatial strategy policies and the limited harm from loss of best and most versatile agricultural land, notwithstanding conflict with the development plan as a whole
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP1Policy CP2Policy CP3Policy CP6Policy CP7Policy CP8Policy CP9Policy CP15Policy HC3Policy ES3Policy ES6Policy ES10Policy ES12NP Policy CAMCD1NP Policy CAMCD2NP Policy CAMES1Local Transport Plan 2020-2041 Policy PD0.3Local Transport Plan 2020-2041 Policy PD0.4emerging plan Policy PS24
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 58Paragraph 62Paragraph 63Paragraph 78Paragraph 96Paragraph 98Paragraph 100Paragraph 101Paragraph 103Paragraph 115Paragraph 116Paragraph 117Paragraph 118Paragraph 130Paragraph 135Paragraph 187Paragraph 193
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Stroud
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed13 October 20266009483Land Northwest of Stonehouse, Grid Ref Easting: 379777. Grid Ref Northing: 207047, Stonehouse, Gl10 3WP
- Allowed5 October 20266007595Land at Epney, Framilode, Gloucester, GL27LL
- Dismissed29 September 20266005652Agricultural Barn, Upton Hill, Upton St Leonards, GL4 8DF
- Dismissed5 May 20263376602Land Adjoining The Deyne, Littleworth, Amberley, Stroud, Gloucestershire, GL5 5AL
- Dismissed26 March 20266002277Land at Verney Road, Verney Road, Stonehouse, Gloucestershire, GL10 2QD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®