Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 January 20263366289

Broadfields Nursery, Broad Road, BRAINTREE, CM7 5NJ

use of land for the siting of mobile homes

Authority
Braintree District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
caravan-gypsy · Other minor developments
Inspector
Oyebade A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development is appropriate for a countryside location and compatible with the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • the effect on the living conditions of future occupiers of the development and neighbouring dwellings
  • the effect on ecology in the area
  • the effect on flood risk in the locality
  • adequacy of infrastructure in the area to support the development

What decided it

The proposal's clear conflict with the spatial strategy and design principles of the development plan, particularly its incompatibility with the countryside location and semi-rural character of the area, combined with material harm to neighbouring living conditions and unresolved ecological concerns, decisively outweighed the limited housing and economic benefits.

The limited benefits of housing supply and economic activity during construction and occupation were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by lasting harm to the countryside, ecology, and living conditions of both future occupiers and neighbouring residents, particularly given the Council's demonstrated 5-year housing land supply.

Plan policies cited: Policy SP1, Policy SP7, Policy SP6, Policy LPP1, Policy LPP31, Policy LPP35, Policy LPP43, Policy LPP50, Policy LPP52, Policy LPP64, Policy LPP65, Policy LPP76, Policy LPP78

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.