Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 November 20253366385

Unit D, Knowle Village, Fareham, PO17 5FL

Authority
Winchester City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Willis S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the provision of local facilities/services
  • Whether the proposal provides appropriate living conditions for future occupiers with regard to outlook and outdoor space
  • The effect of the proposal on highway safety
  • The effect of the proposal on the character of the area and community cohesion
  • Whether the proposal would preserve the Grade II listed building known as 'Knowle Hospital, former County Pauper Asylum' and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses

What decided it

The proposal would fail to preserve the special interest of the Grade II listed building by eroding the remaining openness and legibility of its former use as a chapel, causing moderate less-than-substantial harm that was not outweighed by the public benefits, combined with the unjustified loss of a local facility/service contrary to Policy CP6.

The moderate less-than-substantial harm to the designated heritage asset and the loss of a local facility/service were not outweighed by the limited public benefits from housing supply (given the Council's deliverable 5-year supply), reduced traffic movements compared to the fallback commercial use, and minimal noise benefits.

Framework references: 210

Plan policies cited: Policy CP6, Policy CP20, Policy DM15, Policy DM16, Policy DM17, Policy DM18, Policy DM29

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.