Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 October 20253366465

Altman Smith & Co, Leverton House 461-463 London Road, Sheffield, S2 4HL

Planning appeal 3366465 at Altman Smith & Co, Leverton House 461-463 London Road, Sheffield, S2 4HL (Sheffield City Council) was dismissed on 6 October 2025 by Inspector Teasdale N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the site and surrounding area, including whether it would preserve the setting of the non-designated heritage asset (461-463 London Road).

retention of ground floor office use (Class E) and alterations to building to create 2no. self-contained residential units (C3), including the erection of a two-storey rear extension, and a first-floor extension with accommodation at first-floor level and roofspace, and the creation of a communal roof terrace

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Teasdale N
Postcode
S2 4HL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the site and surrounding area, including whether it would preserve the setting of the non-designated heritage asset (461-463 London Road)
  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the existing occupiers of No 465 London Road with particular regard to privacy, light and ventilation
  • Whether the proposed development would be suitably located having regard to its location in flood zone 3 and the risk of flooding

What decided it

The proposed development fails the sequential test for flood risk by locating residential development in flood zone 3 without demonstrating that no reasonably available lower-risk sites exist, and this alone provides a strong reason for refusal under paragraph 11(d)(i) of the Framework.

The modest housing benefit of 2 units, even accounting for the Council's shortfall in five-year housing land supply, is significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of a non-designated heritage asset, the unacceptable harm to the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, and the failure to meet flood risk requirements.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy S10 UDPPolicy BE5 UDPPolicy BE20 UDPPolicy CS74 CSPolicy CS64 CSPolicy CS67 CSPolicy GE19 UDP
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 131Paragraph 135Paragraph 161Paragraph 170Paragraph 173Paragraph 174Paragraph 175Paragraph 177Paragraph 178Paragraph 181Paragraph 207Paragraph 208Paragraph 210Paragraph 216Paragraph 232

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

156 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Sheffield City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266014327
    4 Struan Road, Sheffield, S7 2EH
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266009090
    Meadow Farm, Whiteley Wood Road, Sheffield, S11 7TJ
  3. Dismissed20 October 20266014347
    Advertising Right Adjacent Park House, Bernard Road, Sheffield, S2 5BQ
  4. Allowed16 October 20266014719
    1 Twickenham Court, Halfway, Sheffield, S20 4HT
  5. Allowed12 October 20266012829
    189 Crimicar Lane, Sheffield, S10 4EH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.