Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 March 20263367014

1 Codington Gardens, Gravesend, Kent, DA12 5DB

proposed new attached dwelling with associated parking

Authority
Gravesham Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Oyebade A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • effect on the character and appearance of the area
  • living conditions of residents of neighbouring dwellings
  • living conditions of future occupiers of the development
  • ecology in the area

What decided it

The failure to secure the required SAMMS contribution to mitigate impacts on the Thames Estuary and Marshes SPA and Ramsar site meant the adverse ecological impact significantly and demonstrably outweighed the housing benefits under the tilted balance.

the adverse impact on the Thames Estuary and Marshes SPA and Ramsar site significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing delivery and self-build provision

Framework references: 11, 63

Plan policies cited: Policy CS19, Policy CS12, Gravesham Local Plan Core Strategy (2014), Design for Gravesham (adopted 2024), Gravesham Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) 2 (Adopted February 1996; amended June 2020)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.