Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 October 20253367061

405 Kingston Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT19 0BT

Planning appeal 3367061 at 405 Kingston Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT19 0BT (Epsom and Ewell Borough Council) was dismissed on 20 October 2025 by Inspector Pattison B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal provides a satisfactory standard of accommodation for residential occupiers, with particular regard to its internal space.

Change of Use from existing rear offices (Use Class E) to a residential dwelling (Use Class C3) (retrospective)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Pattison B
Postcode
KT19 0BT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal provides a satisfactory standard of accommodation for residential occupiers, with particular regard to its internal space
  • whether the loss of the employment use has been adequately justified, having regard to local and national planning policy

What decided it

The proposal would provide unacceptably poor living conditions due to a significant shortfall in internal floorspace against the Nationally Described Space Standards, combined with the unjustified loss of employment use without adequate marketing evidence.

The benefits of housing delivery and the shortfall in five-year housing land supply were outweighed by the significant harm to future occupiers' living conditions and the loss of employment floorspace without adequate justification.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM12Policy DM10Policy DM24
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 8

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

165 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Epsom and Ewell Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed29 October 20266011091
    20 Bradford Drive, Ewell, KT19 0AH
  2. Dismissed29 October 20266004732
    57-61 High Street, Ewell, KT17 1RX
  3. Dismissed6 October 20266010565
    Land To The Rear Of 11 Ruxley Close,, West Ewell, KT19 9ND
  4. Dismissed7 August 20266006401
    11 Danetree Road, West Ewell, KT19 9SA
  5. Quashed On Legal Grounds30 July 20263361942
    The Land Known As 11 Woodlands Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT18 7HW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.