Planning appeal decision
Old School House, Park Lane, Old Knebworth, Hertfordshire, SG3 6PR
Planning appeal 3367306 at Old School House, Park Lane, Old Knebworth, Hertfordshire, SG3 6PR (North Hertfordshire District Council) was dismissed on 15 September 2025 by Inspector Whitfield H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, including whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Old Knebworth Conservation Area (CA) and the effect on trees.
the construction of a terrace containing 5no. single storey residential dwelling houses with associated landscaping, boundary fencing and cycle storage
- Authority
- North Hertfordshire District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Whitfield H
- Postcode
- SG3 6PR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, including whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Old Knebworth Conservation Area (CA) and the effect on trees
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to relevant development plan policies and the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework), including the effect upon the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposed development on highway and pedestrian safety
- the effect of the development on protected species, with particular regard to bats
- if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development
What decided it
The proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt with no very special circumstances to justify it, and causes less than substantial harm to the Conservation Area that is not outweighed by public benefits, both providing strong reasons for refusal under paragraph 11(d)(ii) of the Framework.
The modest benefits of housing delivery and social and economic benefits were clearly outweighed by the substantial harm to Green Belt openness, less than substantial but considerable harm to the Conservation Area, harm to highway and pedestrian safety, and potential harm to protected species; the very special circumstances necessary to justify inappropriate Green Belt development do not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP2Policy SP5Policy D1Policy NE2Policy NE4Policy T1Policy HE1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 212
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in North Hertfordshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed1 October 20266009720Land Adjacent To 1 Ninesprings Cottage, Wymondley Road, Hitchin, SG4 9QL
- Allowed10 July 20266008092Fen Farm, Rabley Heath Road, Codicote, AL6 9UA
- Dismissed7 May 20263375383Land At Chruch Wood, Three Houses Lane, Codicote, Hertfordshire, SG4 8
- Allowed4 March 20266000934Pulmer Water Caravan Site, St Albans Road, Codicote, Hertfordshire, SG4 8SP
- Dismissed23 September 20253368416Land Adjacent To Breachwood Green Industrial Park, Pasture Lane, Hitchin, SG4 8NY
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®