Planning appeal decision
Glebe Meadow , Adjacent King Georges Field , Station Road Southminster , Essex, CM0 7GZ
Planning appeal 3367409 at Glebe Meadow , Adjacent King Georges Field , Station Road Southminster , Essex, CM0 7GZ (Maldon District Council) was dismissed on 19 September 2025 by Inspector Chamberlain G, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site is an appropriate location for the proposed development, with reference to the spatial strategy in the Local Plan (LDP).
‘Application for planning permission to create 36 no. one, two, three and four bedroom houses and maisonettes, associated landscaping, roads, parking and drainage infrastructure, plus a new area of public open space and the addition of a footway to the east side of Vicarage Court’
- Authority
- Maldon District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Chamberlain G
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal site is an appropriate location for the proposed development, with reference to the spatial strategy in the Local Plan (LDP)
- The effect of the proposed footway on i) the character and appearance of the area and ii) the living conditions of existing residents
- Whether the proposed development would provide appropriate living conditions for future occupants, with reference to noise, disturbance and privacy
- Whether the proposed development would provide an adequate housing mix
- Whether the proposed development would adequately mitigate the effect on reptiles
- The effect of the proposed development on early years education
What decided it
The cumulative and unresolved harms — to the character of Vicarage Court, the living conditions of existing and future occupants, and the failure to secure enforceable mitigation for protected reptiles — were found to significantly and demonstrably outweigh the housing and other benefits, including those arising from the housing land supply shortfall.
The benefits of housing delivery (including addressing a serious 2.7-year housing land supply shortfall), affordable housing and other modest benefits were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the harms to the character and appearance of Vicarage Court, living conditions of existing and future occupants, housing mix, and unmitigated harm to protected reptiles.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S1Policy S8Policy D1Policy H4Policy H2Policy I1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 58Paragraph 200
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Maldon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed18 August 20266005664Land West of Spratts Farm, Queenborough Road, Southminster, CM0 7AD
- Allowed6 July 20266004910Land West of the Cemetery, London Road,, Maldon, CM9 6LJ
- Allowed2 February 20263365410Reddings Farm, Reddings Lane, Tillingham, CM0 7NX
- Allowed15 July 20253349854Paynes Cottage Walden House Road, Great Totham, Maldon, CM9 8PN
- Dismissed8 July 20253354918Manor Farm , Walden House Road, Great Totham, Essex, CM9 8PN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®