Planning appeal decision
Sweetwater Lane, Elberton, Thornbury, South Gloucestershire, BS35 3JX
Planning appeal 3367505 at Sweetwater Lane, Elberton, Thornbury, South Gloucestershire, BS35 3JX (South Gloucestershire Council) was dismissed on 21 October 2025 by Inspector Barton P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
change of use of existing stable block and immediate curtilage to form 1 (C3) residential dwelling house
- Authority
- South Gloucestershire Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Barton P
- Postcode
- BS35 3JX
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
- whether the appeal site would be a suitable location for the proposed development, in terms of access to services and facilities
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- if the proposal is found to be inappropriate development, whether other considerations clearly outweigh the harm to the Green Belt and any other harm as to amount to very special circumstances
What decided it
The buildings were incomplete and the stable block had not been used for its intended purpose, so the proposal could not constitute a re-use under paragraph 154(h)(iv) of the Framework and therefore constituted inappropriate development in the Green Belt that was not justified by very special circumstances.
Substantial weight was given to the harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and moderate harm to openness, and the unsuitability of the location for residential development due to poor access to services and facilities; the limited benefits of a single dwelling and biodiversity improvements did not comprise very special circumstances to outweigh this harm.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS 5Policy PSP7Policy PSP11Policy PSP40
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 153Paragraph 154
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Gloucestershire Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed13 October 20266010963Elmbarn Farm, Westerleigh Road, Westerleigh, BS37 8QF
- Dismissed13 October 20266009931Land at Wapley Road, Codrington, Bristol, BS37 6RY
- Planning permission granted4 September 20263378284Land Adjacent to Orchard Farm Cottage, Pomphrey Hill, Mangotsfield, Bristol, BS16 9NF
- Planning permission granted17 August 20263378286Land At Northwick Road, Pilning, Bristol, BS35 4LX
- Dismissed13 July 20266006492Long Acre Farm, Dodington Lane, Dodington, BS37 6SD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®