Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 September 20253367644

1 Amersham Avenue, Edmonton, N18 1DS

a single storey side extension with integrated solar panels

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Manson S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The scale, bulk and prominence of the proposed extension would cause unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area by appearing incongruous and overly dominant, disrupting the established rhythm of built form and eroding the sense of openness.

Plan policies cited: Policy D4, Policy D8, Policy CP30, Policy DMD6, Policy DMD8, Policy DMD11, Policy DMD14, Policy DMD37

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.