Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 September 20253367754

36 Uxendon Crescent, Wembley, HA9 9TN

the construction of a front porch, a single-storey rear extension, a first-floor infill, a loft conversion from a hip to a gable roof, floor plan redesign, external landscaping, and all associated works for the existing semi-detached house, the property will be converted into a 6-bedroom House in Multiple Occupation (HMO)

Authority
London Borough of Brent
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Harrison F

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 34 and 38 Uxendon Crescent, with regard to outlook and daylight
  • whether acceptable living conditions for future occupiers of the proposed development would be provided
  • whether the proposal would promote sustainable modes of transport

What decided it

The proposal would be unduly harmful to the character and appearance of the area due to the discordant roof design, harmful to neighbouring living conditions regarding outlook, and would not promote sustainable modes of transport, bringing it into conflict with the development plan with no material considerations to indicate otherwise.

Plan policies cited: Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021), Policy DMP1 of the Brent Local Plan 2019-2041 (2022), Policy BD1 of the Brent Local Plan 2019-2041 (2022), Policy BH7 of the Brent Local Plan 2019-2041 (2022), Policy BT1 of the Brent Local Plan 2019-2041 (2022), Policy BT2 of the Brent Local Plan 2019-2041 (2022)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.