Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 November 20253367910

8 The Ridgeway, London, N14 6NU

Planning appeal 3367910 at 8 The Ridgeway, London, N14 6NU (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 18 November 2025 by Inspector Nutman E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the dormer and rooflights would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Meadway Conservation Area.

a ground floor rear extension, loft conversion and rear dormer addition, garage front and rear addition, plus roof alterations

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Nutman E
Postcode
N14 6NU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the dormer and rooflights would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Meadway Conservation Area
  • The effect of the single storey rear extension on the living conditions of the occupiers of Number 6 The Ridgeway with specific regard to outlook and light

What decided it

The proposed dormer and rooflights would cause less than substantial harm to the conservation area that could not be outweighed by limited public benefits, and the rear extension would unacceptably harm the outlook of neighbouring occupiers.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D3 London Plan (2021)Policy D4 London Plan (2021)Policy HC1 London Plan (2021)Policy CP30 Core Strategy (2010)Policy CP31 Core Strategy (2010)Policy DMD13 Development Management Document (2014)Policy DMD37 Development Management Document (2014)Policy DMD44 Development Management Document (2014)Policy DMD8 Development Management Document (2014)Policy DMD11 Development Management Document (2014)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

544 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266012855
    77 Conway Road, London, N14 7BD
  2. Dismissed21 October 20266010541
    2 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
  3. Allowed20 October 20266009773
    28 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
  4. Dismissed29 September 20266010207
    61 Hawthorn Road, London, N18 1EY
  5. Dismissed28 September 20266012598
    21 Merrivale, London, N14 4TE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.