Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 November 20253367910

8 The Ridgeway, LONDON, N14 6NU

a ground floor rear extension, loft conversion and rear dormer addition, garage front and rear addition, plus roof alterations

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Nutman E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the dormer and rooflights would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Meadway Conservation Area
  • The effect of the single storey rear extension on the living conditions of the occupiers of Number 6 The Ridgeway with specific regard to outlook and light

What decided it

The proposed dormer and rooflights would cause less than substantial harm to the conservation area that could not be outweighed by limited public benefits, and the rear extension would unacceptably harm the outlook of neighbouring occupiers.

Plan policies cited: Policy D3 London Plan (2021), Policy D4 London Plan (2021), Policy HC1 London Plan (2021), Policy CP30 Core Strategy (2010), Policy CP31 Core Strategy (2010), Policy DMD13 Development Management Document (2014), Policy DMD37 Development Management Document (2014), Policy DMD44 Development Management Document (2014), Policy DMD8 Development Management Document (2014), Policy DMD11 Development Management Document (2014)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.