Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 April 20263367946

Annexe at The Oaks, 21 Main Street, Costock, Nottinghamshire, LE12 6XD

Planning appeal 3367946 at Annexe at The Oaks, 21 Main Street, Costock, Nottinghamshire, LE12 6XD (Rushcliffe Borough Council) was dismissed on 7 April 2026 by Inspector Brownless E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on parking and highway safety.

a ‘change of use from dwelling house (Class C3) to flexible dwelling house (Class C3) and Air BNB (Sui Generis)’

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Change of use
Inspector
Brownless E
Postcode
LE12 6XD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on parking and highway safety
  • whether the development would provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers of the appeal building and occupiers of neighbouring dwellings

What decided it

The appeal scheme fails to demonstrate that suitable off-street vehicular parking space and safe access would serve the proposed use without compromising highway safety, and fails to show that living conditions of occupants of the appeal building and neighbouring dwellings would not be unduly harmed.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 14 of the Rushcliffe Local Plan Part 1: Core Strategy (2014)Policy 1 of the Rushcliffe Local Plan Part 2: Land and Planning Policies (2019)Policy 31 of the Rushcliffe Local Plan Part 2: Land and Planning Policies (2019)Policy 11 of the Rushcliffe Local Plan Part 2: Land and Planning Policies (2019)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

19 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Rushcliffe

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed1 April 20266002146
    2 Bunny Lane, Keyworth, Nottinghamshire, NG12 5JW
  2. Dismissed1 April 20266002145
    2 Bunny Lane, Keyworth, Nottinghamshire, NG12 5JW
  3. Dismissed17 March 20266002204
    Land North Of 2 Covert Road, West Bridgford, Nottinghamshire, NG2 6GP
  4. Allowed8 July 20253364455
    1 Lea Court, Bingam, Nottinghamshire, NG13 8YG
  5. Allowed16 June 20253358676
    Land North West of Lammas Farm, Kneeton Road, East Bridgford, Nottinghamshire, NG13 8PJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.