Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 September 20253368092

9 Broomfield Avenue, London, N13 4JJ

Planning appeal 3368092 at 9 Broomfield Avenue, London, N13 4JJ (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 30 September 2025 by Inspector Hughes L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to the preservation or enhancement of the Lakes Estate Conservation Area.

internal alterations to Flats 1, 2, and 3, including replacement of ground floor side/rear door with window and rear outrigger roof extension to Flat 3

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Hughes L
Postcode
N13 4JJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to the preservation or enhancement of the Lakes Estate Conservation Area

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the significance of the Lakes Estate Conservation Area, to which great weight must be given, outweighed the moderate public benefits of improved living conditions and minor economic benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
London Plan Policy HC1London Plan Policy D3London Plan Policy D6Enfield Core Strategy Policy CP30Enfield Core Strategy Policy CP31Enfield Development Management Document Policy DMD8Enfield Development Management Document Policy DMD13Enfield Development Management Document Policy DMD37Enfield Development Management Document Policy DMD44
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 212Paragraph 215

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

544 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266012855
    77 Conway Road, London, N14 7BD
  2. Dismissed21 October 20266010541
    2 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
  3. Allowed20 October 20266009773
    28 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
  4. Dismissed29 September 20266010207
    61 Hawthorn Road, London, N18 1EY
  5. Dismissed28 September 20266012598
    21 Merrivale, London, N14 4TE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.