Planning appeal decision
Twine Valley Farm, Church Road, Shuttleworth, Bury, BL0 0HH
Planning appeal 3368429 at Twine Valley Farm, Church Road, Shuttleworth, Bury, BL0 0HH (Bury Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 10 November 2025 by Inspector Storey P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, and if it would be inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations amounting to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development.
Slurry pond
- Authority
- Bury Metropolitan Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- agricultural · Minor offices/R&D/light industry
- Inspector
- Storey P
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, and if it would be inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations amounting to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development.
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including its landscape setting.
- Whether it has been adequately demonstrated that the proposal would not lead to unacceptable impacts on land stability and soil pollution.
- Whether the effects of the proposed development on the living conditions of nearby occupiers would be acceptable, with specific regard to the effects of noise, smell, disturbance and general activity associated with the proposal.
- The effect of vehicle movements associated with the proposal on highway and pedestrian safety.
What decided it
The development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that fails to preserve openness and conflicts with the purposes of the Green Belt, and the operational and environmental benefits advanced do not clearly outweigh this substantial harm or the additional harms identified in relation to character and appearance, land stability, and living conditions.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy JP-G9Policy JP-G1Policy JP-P1Policy JP-S5Policy JP-C5Policy JP-C6Policy JP-C8Policy OL4/5Policy OL1/2Policy EN1/2Policy EN7/2Policy RT3/3Policy RT3/4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 187Paragraph 197
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Bury Metropolitan Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed17 August 20266007316Hilsden Farm, Radcliffe, Manchester, M26 1DW
- Dismissed13 July 2026600864765A, Windsor Road, Prestwich, M25 0DB
- Dismissed10 July 20266006642Land Adjoining Plane Trees Farm, Bradley Fold Road, Ainsworth, BL2 5QR
- Allowed26 June 20266006965Land off Bentley Lane, Bury, BL9 6RZ
- Dismissed16 March 20263360490Stand Cricket And Tennis Club Hamilton Road, Manchester, M45 7WF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®