Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed26 November 20253368430

Coloured Ponds, Rogate, PETERSFIELD, GU31 5DL

the building has been occupied as an independent dwelling in excess of 4 years

Authority
South Downs
Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Curnow R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the decision by the SDNPA to refuse to issue a certificate was well-founded

What decided it

The Inspector found the sworn oral evidence of the Appellant and her son to be credible, precise and unambiguous, sufficient to prove four years' continuous residential use of the flat on the balance of probabilities.

Judgments cited: Burdle & Williams v SSE & New Forest DC [1972] 1 WLR 1207; Mumtaz Properties Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 610

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.