Planning appeal decision
Coloured Ponds, Rogate, PETERSFIELD, GU31 5DL
the building has been occupied as an independent dwelling in excess of 4 years
- Authority
- South Downs
- Appeal type
- ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Curnow R
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the decision by the SDNPA to refuse to issue a certificate was well-founded
What decided it
The Inspector found the sworn oral evidence of the Appellant and her son to be credible, precise and unambiguous, sufficient to prove four years' continuous residential use of the flat on the balance of probabilities.
Judgments cited: Burdle & Williams v SSE & New Forest DC [1972] 1 WLR 1207; Mumtaz Properties Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 610
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®