Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 December 20253368604

Meadow View, Bedford Lane, Sunningdale, ASCOT, SL5 0NP

part two storey, part single storey side and rear extensions to the existing house with the introduction of 2 no. rear dormers

Authority
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Morris T

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including the impact on a protected tree
  • the effect of the proposal on protected species
  • if the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The proposal amounts to disproportionate additions to the original dwelling constituting inappropriate Green Belt development, and the totality of harm to openness, character and appearance, protected trees, and potentially protected species is not clearly outweighed by other considerations.

Framework references: 154, 142, 153, 193

Plan policies cited: Policy QP 5, Policy QP 3, Policy NP/EN2, Policy NR 2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.