Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent to the Bull Inn, Bethersden, Ashford, TN26 3LB
Planning appeal 3368725 at Land Adjacent to the Bull Inn, Bethersden, Ashford, TN26 3LB (Ashford Borough Council) was allowed on 9 April 2026 by Inspector Longmuir J, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to the local landscape and the setting of Bethersden.
outline planning permission (with all matters reserved except 'means of access') for the erection of up to 32 dwellings including access from Bull Lane, parking, landscaping, open space and associated infrastructure and earthworks
- Authority
- Ashford Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Longmuir J
- Postcode
- TN26 3LB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to the local landscape and the setting of Bethersden
- the effect of the proposal on the settings of designated Grade II listed buildings: The Bull Inn, The Stables of the Bull Inn, Bridge Farmhouse and Weatherboarded Barn to South West of Bridge Farmhouse
What decided it
The considerable housing land supply shortfall triggering the paragraph 11(d) tilted balance meant the substantial housing and other benefits outweighed the limited landscape harm and low-level less-than-substantial heritage harm.
The substantial planning benefits (housing delivery against a 3.27 year supply, 40% affordable housing, self-build plots, biodiversity net gain) outweighed the limited landscape/character harm and the low-level less-than-substantial heritage harm, such that adverse impacts did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits under the paragraph 11(d) balance
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- HOU5ENV3aENV4ENV13SP6SP1COM1COM2IMP1HOU6HOU14
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 7Paragraph 8Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 58Paragraph 61Paragraph 71Paragraph 98Paragraph 101Paragraph 110Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 215
- Judgments
- Catesby Estates Ltd v Steer [2018] EWCA Civ 1697
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Ashford Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed29 October 20266007592Homestall Farm, Ashford Road, High Halden, TN26 3BS
- Dismissed8 October 20266012673Land 150metres East by Southeast of Barkleys Farm, Burnthouse Lane, Smarden, TN27 8QQ
- Dismissed15 July 20266006719Barn 2, Golden Wood Farm, Brisley Lane, Ruckinge, TN26 2PW
- Allowed22 June 20266003600Tatton Barn, Hamstreet Road, Hamstreet, Ashford, TN26 2EW
- Allowed22 April 20263376208Mainey Farm, Pluckley Road , Maltmans Hill, Smarden, Kent, TN27 8RD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®